Slaughter argues that globalization is not replacing the state, but reshaping it into a system of transgovernmental networks, where domestic institutions collaborate across borders to solve global problems while preserving national sovereignty.
Slaughter fundamentally changes how we should think about the state. Instead of asking whether states are disappearing or being replaced, she shows that they are evolving into something more complex.
Modern states are no longer unitary actors acting only at the top level. They are networks of institutions—courts, regulators, and agencies—that operate both domestically and internationally. These institutions collaborate across borders to solve problems that no single country can handle alone, like financial regulation, crime, or environmental issues.
This reframes global politics. The key question is no longer “Who is the most powerful state?” but “Who is best connected and most capable within global networks?” Power comes from participation, coordination, and influence across systems, not just military or economic strength.
It also resolves a major debate: states are neither being replaced (as some globalization theories claim) nor fully dominant in the old sense (as realism suggests). Instead, they are being restructured.
👉 So what this means is:
To understand modern politics, you have to look beyond governments as single actors and see the web of institutions linking states together, because that’s where real governance is increasingly happening.