Globalism or Apartheid on a Global Scale? — Samir Amin (2001)

Amin argues that modern globalization continues imperialism by concentrating economic, technological, financial, and military power in wealthy capitalist countries. Rather than allowing poorer nations to catch up, this global system preserves unequal development and dependency, creating what he calls “apartheid on a global scale.”

1. Global Capitalism Inherently Produces Inequality Between Powerful Centers and Dependent Peripheries

2. Globalization Is the Modern Form of Imperialism

3. Modern Imperialism Operates Through Economic, Technological, Political, and Military Power

4. Poorer Countries Are Disadvantaged by How They Are Integrated into the Global Economy, Not Because They Are Excluded From It

5. Overcoming “Global Apartheid” Requires Restructuring Globalization Itself

🧠 Conclusion

Amin argues that modern imperialism does not depend on formal colonial rule.

Global capitalism divides the world into powerful centers and subordinate peripheries, and this inequality can persist even when poorer countries are politically independent and economically integrated. ⭐

Today, dominance operates through control over finance, technology, natural resources, media, international institutions, and military power, allowing wealthy centers to retain disproportionate control over how the global economy develops. ⭐

His broader point is that globalization itself is not necessarily the problem; the problem is the unequal form globalization takes under capitalism. ⭐

Countries can participate extensively in the world economy while remaining dependent if they lack control over their own development. Amin therefore advocates a more pluricentric, post-capitalist globalization in which countries have greater autonomy, global economic rules are negotiated more equally, finance and trade are regulated, social and ecological rights are strengthened, and international institutions become more democratic.

• source