Britain and the Arab-Israeli War of 1948 — Avi Shlaim, 1987.

In this influential revisionist history, Avi Shlaim challenges both Zionist and Palestinian narratives about Britain’s role in the 1948 war.

Using newly declassified British records, he argues that Britain was motivated primarily by imperial interests rather than loyalty to either side.

The article examines Britain’s relationship with Transjordan, its opposition to an independent Palestinian state, and its efforts to preserve influence in the Middle East during the collapse of the Mandate.

1. Britain Acted Primarily to Protect Imperial Interests

2. Britain Opposed an Independent Palestinian State and Favored “Greater Transjordan”

3. Britain Cooperated With King Abdullah to Advance This Goal

4. Britain Did Not Seek Israel’s Destruction

5. Britain Worked to Contain and Manage the War Rather Than Expand It

6. Britain Ultimately Failed to Control the Outcome

🧠 Conclusion

Shlaim reveals that the 1948 war was not simply a struggle between Arabs and Jews, but also a contest shaped by British imperial strategy, Cold War fears, and regional power politics. ⭐

The article challenges nationalist narratives on both sides, arguing that Britain pursued its own interests above all else. ⭐

The main takeaway is that major historical events are often driven not only by local actors, but also by outside powers pursuing strategic goals that can profoundly shape outcomes.